United Neighbors tells it In under a minute:
Many rallies against Sacramento’s failed housing policy
From Left :
Dick Spotswood: Opinion Columnist, Marin IJ
Eileen Burke: San Anselmo City Council Member
Carolyn Lenert: former San Rafael Fire Commissioner
Amy Kalish: Citizen Marin / WAKE UP CA
Pat Eklund, Novato City Council member
Michael Rex: Architect
Susan Kirsch: Catalysts for Local Control founder
Not shown:
Frank Egger, Fairfax City Council Member
Full video here:
https://vimeo.com/1112780698/90061b7a4c?&login=true#
FIRST COALITION PROTEST
NO ON SB 79
Marin, San Francisco, San Diego, Los Angeles
San Fernando Valley and many others
in the first coalition protest against
Sacramento’s failed housing policy
We’re not just going to take it any more!
Gathering beforehand
After the rally, with some enthusiastic supporters
Excerpt:
For years, Marin’s cities and unincorporated areas have juggled ambitious state housing mandates with realities of wildfire risk, evacuation constraints, sensitive and beautiful ecology, fragile infrastructure and beloved historic districts.
We’ve done the hard work — parcel by parcel, plan by plan — crafting state-certified “housing elements” to add multi-family housing while protecting public safety while preserving what we can.
Senate Bill 79 before the California Legislature now would sweep that work aside, dropping half-mile radius bull’s-eyes around “qualified transit stops” statewide. Developers could automatically build projects five to seven stories inside those circles, at densities from 80 up to 120 units per acre.
When buildings pop up in their neighborhoods — sometimes with little notice — residents will likely blame their local governments, who will be acting with their hands tied. Cities that hesitate to approve SB 79 projects would automatically be considered in violation of law and swiftly fined.
All of downtown Sausalito, regardless of infrastructure limitations, traffic congestion, the historic district, and the area ’s recently upgraded fire hazard status — without expandable egress.
All of downtown Tiburon and into Belvedere, already incredibly congested, with hundreds of dead end streets that complicate evacuation onto a single road out to the freeway.
Affects actual existing low income houseboats and trailer park, surrounding hills across from the ferry — an area already gridlocked to the Richmond San Rafael bridge much of the day.
The SMART stop doubles the area’s density potential, extending across the freeway into Greenbrae neighborhoods and commercial areas.
Two large projects are already planned in the area. This would allow unlimited density through the areas of Terra Linda, Santa Venetia, and Los Ranchitos, regardless of emergency egress
Customers have questions, you have answers. Display the most frequently asked questions, so everybody benefits.
In Marin, SB 79’s half mile radius bullseyes would land on every ferry terminal and SMART station — and would include Golden Gate Transit express lane stops and any future SMART extensions. This overrules our planning. It just drops a big circle over the ferries and SMART stops and allows unlimited development within. This is planning by circle, and it doesn’t work here. Our infrastructure will be overwhelmed and quality of life for everyone will drop. Imagine five to seven stories, density from 80-120 units per acre — it doesn’t not fit. .
Fire Hazard Zones may sound exempt, but if buildings meet required code, they qualify. The densification of hazard areas greatly impacts evacuation potential, but it gets no mention. Sausalito is greatly constricted already, Tiburon has one road out for thousands. Many streets are dead ends, so you can’t
SB 79 covers whole of both downtowns and into low scale but super dense neighborhoods. The housing elements tried to site the huge mandates so they would fit in but this gives developers the leverage to use any parcel. Historic districts are fair game. No place for residents or tourists to park if these new developments don’t provide parking. They can use up the space for the very low, low, and moderate income housing the state demands the towns produce.
BECAUSE STATE HOUSING POLICY
FAVORS LUXURY OVER AFFORDABILITY,
REPLACES PLANNING WITH PROFITS,
IGNORES HAZARDS AND THE ENVIRONMENT,
AND SETS UP CITIES TO FAIL
The state demands 2.5 million more residences by 2031, regardless of each city’s actual needs. Why? The California Department of Finance refuted the numbers in 2023 — projections show the population will not grow 7+ million by 2031; it‘s projected almost flat through 2060. That’s not due to lack of housing. It’s due to our aging population, declining birth rates, economic realities, higher outmigration, and lower inmigration.
In other words, the mandates are based on “aspirations,” not need.
But the state isn’t backing off the outrageous numbers, instead supporting “ad hoc” methodology that intentionally over burdens cities . See the blog post “Think those RHNA numbers are based on something scientific?” below.
NOT ABOUT AFFORDABILITY AT ALL
SB 79 math allows zoning potential of up to 43,000 units per bubble — though no one wants to build out just under twice the density of Manhattan, the sky’s the limit.
Minimal to zero affordability is required. Trying to stop any project is considered a violation of SB 330 and results in immediate fines.
See blog post below.
We need new efforts to infirm and engage people statewide on the devastating effects of California housing policy. To that end I will soon be launching WAKE UP CALIFORNIA! The goal is narrative change and bring together all of our organizations statewide — from neighborhoods to Our Neighborhood Voices. Please see blog post below for more information.
STAFF REFUSING TO BUDGE
Please see previous posts about the Corcoran Community Plans lawsuit for context; update below in blog post.
Using Sonoma County as a case study, the film showcases community opposition to state-mandated housing policies, county supervisors' decisions, and a developer's plans to transform a beloved, historic, and environmentally sensitive wildlife corridor into a large-scale development with minimal affordable housing.
Blog post below
WE NEED TO MAKE OUR VOICES HEARD AGAIN — FAST! PLEASE SIGN ASAP, CUTOFF OCTOBER 28th!
ASK OUR SUPERVISORS TO SIMPLY FOLLOW THE COURT ORDER!
The petition contains this letter and full explanation of the issues:
We, the undersigned, strongly support the Planning Commission’s reasoning and decision that simply restores the relevance of community plans, as per court order, without staff’s unnecessary language that further complicates interpretation of our Countywide Plan. We ask you to end this contentious chapter by following the recommendation of your expert Planning Commission, and simply remove the precedence clauses.
Amy Kalish,
Director, Citizen Marin
Chair, Tam Design Review Board (signing as an individual)
At the last Planning Commission hearing, Commissioner Desser made such strong points that I write an Op Ed to highlight her comments, and the constant attempts by CDA staff to undermine Marin County’s interests.
The piece ran in the Marin IJ and is available here as a petition update:
Three sold out showings at the Sebastiani Theater in Sonoma , with excellent panel discussions.
Showing for public and local government in Los Altos Hills, I was a panelist
Catalyst Town Hall event featured the film; Carolyn Scott and I were panelists
To as about setting up a showing in your area, please email:
1citizenmarin.org
From the Mercury: “We’ve known about the structural deficit, which results from expenses associated with the housing element and increases to the sheriff’s contract, exacerbated by staff turnover and rising legal and consulting fees,” said Portola Valley Mayor Sarah Wernikoff during a Town Council meeting earlier this month.
Among the town’s largest expenses are costs associated with its contract with the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office, compliance with state housing requirements, and employee-related costs.
Portola Valley has also incurred unexpected costs for consultancy services to revise its housing plan, known as the housing element, which was decertified earlier this year. This decertification requires planning for affordable housing growth, and the town has spent approximately $1.7 million on consultants and legal fees related to the housing element this fiscal year.
The state’s Housing and Community Development Board decertified the town’s housing element after delays in rezoning areas to accommodate 253 additional homes — just a small share of the Bay Area’s targeted 441,000 homes that it is supposed to build by 2031.
Using Sonoma County as a case study, the film showcases community opposition to state-mandated housing policies, county supervisors' decisions, and a developer's plans to transform a beloved, historic, and environmentally sensitive wildlife corridor into a large-scale development with minimal affordable housing.
Blog post below
County finally acknowledging the Superior Court ruling in favor of Corcoran vs County of Marin — which would restore community plans — but the changes made to plans still muddy the waters.
blog post below with my 7/30/24 letter to the Board of Supervisors
Emmy-nominated, award winning filmmaker Carolyn Scott’s new film in progress, "SMALL IS BEAUTIFUL," documents a small rural community’s fierce battle against an ill-conceived, massive development in a high-fire risk zone — and atop a crucial wildlife corridor. This project threatens safety, the environment, and biodiversity,
California's relentless urbanization takes center stage in this compelling documentary. Highly recommended,. Trailer here, more info coming soon:
This “spot” bill happened so fast there weren’t even any arguments submitted in support or opposition; please put your voice into the public record now!
We can all recognize the critical need for affordable housing. None of the current punitive policies that rely on the private market are going to create it, and cities are punished as a result. SB 7 is a continuation of these dangerous, destructive, and unsuccessful policies.
See blog post below for details
Big win for local zoning control. Five Charter Cities sued the state over SB9, a 2022 state law that allows homeowners to split lots, and add 2 homes to each side — without neighborhood notice or on site parking. It was ruled unconstitutional in Charter Cities (which have their own constitutions, as opposed to General Law cities). The court decision soundly questions housing policy that promotes a “housing emergency” with the cover of “affordability”— while the law has provisions to provide none; there is not a single word in the law about affordability or even a requirement to rent any of the resulting new homes.
See blog post below for details
San Diego Area cities are facing mid-cycle review soon, and bluntly tell the HCD that they resent being set up for failure. They can approve projects, but HCD only counts permits pulled — an action taken by developers. Because they can’t get most developers to add more than 10% affordable units, they will fail the low income category mandates even if massive numbers of new units are built.
See what every locality’s future is like:
start at minute 43 to skip over HCD presentation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arKeg7IFk7w&t=2617s
full video:
Marin County Community Plans have long zoned sensitive wildlife areas, the Bay Lands Corridor, the Ridge and Upland Green Belts, areas with no water or sewage, and no road access at lowest density -- allowing the fewest homes per acre possible.
The County is moving forward to codify changes that go beyond what is required. These areas will be open to density, just to “prove to the state that we‘re serious about housing.” These areas aren’t suitable for anything but market rate homes — if that.
This doesn’t improve access to affordable housing. See more in blog post below.
Not satisfied with last year’s SB 423 to override Coastal Commission decisions, this years’s laws intend to gut the commission and allow density along our treasured coastline — for profit, largely market rate, and close to the shore.
SB 951 is whipping through the senate, along with two others. The assembly will be next to push back or — cave.
So many major insurers non-renewed policies that the state insurance plan — FAIR — is on the brink of insolvency. Plans are not just being cancelled for fire risk, they’re being cancelled for age of home and density — in cities! The state is trying to lure insurers back with a plan that lets them use disaster modelling to base rates, which can set them sky high. It also allows easier rate increases. Unless you’re a mega corp, you can’t build or buy homes without insurance.
New legislation will make it possible for the state to start fining cities up to $10,000 per day, to $50,000 per month, starting at the time they are noticed that their housing elements are being revoked. There are plenty of other fines, withholding of funds, and lawsuits that already pressure cities — watch the SANDAG video to see how impossible it is to satisfy the HCD and avoid Attorney General Bonta’s Housing Strike Force.
ECONOMIST MICHAEL BARNES
SHARON RUSHTON SHREDS FALSE HOUSING CRISIS NARRATIVE
https://marinpost.org/blog/2023/5/19/power-players-problematic-playbook-for-housing
"The county had to reduce the number of sites it was reserving for people with lower and moderate incomes so it could meet the State's target for producing homes for people with above-moderate incomes. The State would not allow us to carry a deficit in the above-moderate income category."
The state has a vision of California -- and Marin -- that was not shared with the voters. This site has a lot of information on how this happened, what to expect, and how to work together to put the brakes on it.
This is a free market solution in no way responsible to the communities that will be affected.
Sign up to hear from us about specials, sales, and events.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.