Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
The state demands 2.5 million more residences by 2031, regardless of each city’s actual needs. Why? They are using 2013 numbers from an old census. Population projections from the California Department of Finance refute the bloated mandates: the population will not grow 7+ million by 2031, it actually remains almost flat through 2060. It’s not because of lack of housing. It’s due to aging population, declining birth rates, and expected migration. In other words, it’s based on facts, not “aspirations.”
THERE IS A NEW VISION OF CALIFORNIA— AND MARIN — THAT WAS NOT SHARED WITH THE VOTERS
During 2020, while we were all distracted by covid, our lawmakers were busy. The governor declared a housing crisis, and the legislature started passing a huge number of housing laws to eliminate any local input that could slow the pace of housing. Permits, traffic studies, public hearings, lot coverage limitations, CEQA (California Enivronmental Quality Act) ... all are now considered nuisances. The laws forced cities to re-zone and change land use policies. They created a streamlined approval process to incentivize builders, and added a bunch of sweeteners. For developers, all carrot. For cities, all stick.
This is a free market solution in no way responsible to the communities that will be affected.
LOW INCOME HOUSING — THE TYPE NEEDED — IS A VERY SECONDARY PART OF THESE NEW HOUSING LAWS. The state has used it as an excuse to disable city planning and let developers do as they please, practically anywhere, as long as they build large multi-unit projects.
YOUR COMMUNITY NO LONGER MATTERS
Local governments — our link to democracy — have been sidelined under extreme pressure. New laws are crushingly punitive for cities out of compliance. Your town’s character is no longer relevant. No more planning commissions, public notice or input, no more story poles…Cities are hiring ombudsman to help developers expedite any multi family projects. New laws passed this week (9/7/23 ) are further dismantling CEQA, and other protections — even to the coat, overriding the Coastal Commission.
Demands on cities to site the huge amount of housing required are so extreme that about 40% are still out of compliance as of and subject to builder’s remedy (as of 9/12/23). HCD guidance is so vague that their rejection letters cause delays as cities try to figure out what they need to do. Menlo Park just got certified. One condition: No more story poles https://www.almanacnews.com/news/2023/08/30/menlo-park-strikes-out-a-third-time-with-its-housing-element
The mandates and laws force small towns in hazard zones to make bad choices. It doesn’t leave room for meaningful affordable housing. It no longer leaves room fir home ownership, the way that families create generational wealth.
Long term city planning is no longer the way our communities will grow. Massive market rate projects with a small percentage of affordability are already being granted swift approvals, plunked practically anywhere, and city/county governments have no say.
HOUSING ELEMENTS MUST PLAN FOR 40% LUXURY HOUSING
THIS IS NOT A SOLUTION TO THE ACTUAL PROBLEM, IT IS PROFIT DRIVEN
SHARON RUSHTON SHREDS FALSE HOUSING CRISIS NARRATIVE
https://marinpost.org/blog/2023/5/19/power-players-problematic-playbook-for-housing
THERE WAS A REAL PROBLEM. THIS IS A TERRIBLE SOLUTION
The state took a sledgehammer to local land use policy and stripped cities of the right to even question development. The legislated for-profit method: remove all perceived impediments to development:
In exchange for adding a minimal number of lower cost or rent restricted units to projects, developers have free rein to do as they like. State law forces cities to give streamlined approvals and hefty bonuses to such developments, regardless of any local concerns.
To avoid subsidizing needed housing, the state gives for-profit developers are huge incentives to create expensive multi-family housing if they include a small percentage of affordable units. Cities must allow:
The results of this process do not match the types of housing cities are mandated to produce. The mandates (called RHNA — Regional Housing Needs Assessmenot) require roughly 40% at the lower end, 20% in the middle, and 40% at market rate.
The system, however, creates 80% to 90% market rate housing with 10% to 20% lower income units.
Is your town short of expensive housing? No? It’s going to get a lot more, anyway. And when the accounting is done in 2, 4, and 8 year reviews, cities will be punished if developers have not actually built the mandated amount of housing in the correct percentages.
YES, CITIES ARE PUNISHED FOR THE DECISIONS OF DEVELOPERS.
YOUR COMMUNITY NO LONGER MATTERS
Local governments — our link to democracy — have been sidelined under extreme pressure. New laws are crushingly punitive for cities out of compliance. Padding of market rate housing into the for profit model clutters the amount of space small cities still have. It doesn’t leave room for meaningful low income housing. Long term city planning is no longer the way our communities will grow. Massive projects with a small percentage of affordability will be granted swift approval.
2.5 MILLION UNITS?
WHY DOES CALIFORNIA NEED A MILLION NEW MARKET RATE HOMES?
These numbers do not represent reality. The actual population projections through 2031 (all the way to 2060) are basically flat. But the state is not backing down. H Governor Newsom refers to the 2.5 , reduced from 3.5 million, as “aspirational “— an acknowledgement they are not based in reality — but there are still severe consequences for towns that don’t make these numbers.
THE SHORTAGE IS AT THE LOWER INCOME ENDS.
This policy clogs everything up with expensive housing.
Cities are acutely aware, and are shuffling funds for low income housing towards homeless programs,
BUT THE STATE WILL NOT COUNT THESE EFFORTS TOWARDS RHNA.
The rise of corporate and institutional investors like Blackstone and its subsidiaries have exacerbated the lack of low income housing stock. Not just in California — this is a worldwide endeavor that consolidates ownership to the detriment of renters. They purchase apartment buildings in “undervalued” neighborhoods,, and gentrify them. Working class residents lose their homes to large purchases of apartment buildings and whole neighborhoods, and the housing is upgraded out of their price range.
When Governor Newsom declared a housing emergency, these larger factors were ignored.. He places blame for slow production — especially in low to moderate categories — squarely on cities. On NIMBYs. New laws remove perceived impediments to development: permits, public input, environmental review.
WE ARE SET UP FOR FAILURE
Even if cities approve projects, they aren’t counted until permits are pulled they are built.
The chart at the bottom shows the Regional Housing Allocation Numbers ( RHNA) that Marin cities are required to add. This cycle (6) runs from 2023-2031. The 5th cycle numbers are at the far right if the chart; the increases are enormous.
WHO IS SUING
Bob Silvestri
https://www.marinij.com/2023/02/08/fairfax-sued-over-tardy-plan-for-housing/
Fairfax sued
https://www.marinij.com/2023/02/15/housing-lawsuits-against-marin-cities-funded-by-realtors/
Sausalito sued by housing advocates over alleged quota violations
marinij.com
Marin cities risk ‘builder’s remedy’ over housing plan delays
marinij.com
Marin IJ Readers’ Forum for Jan. 28, 2023
marinij.com
YIMBY Law Set to Sue Sausalito Over Allegedly Out-of-Compliance Housing Element
sfist.com
YIMBYs Bombard Bay Area Cities With Housing Lawsuits
sfstandard.com
California cities face flurry of lawsuits over missed housing mandate
courthousenews.
Our Work | CA for Homeownership caforhomes.org
The California YIMBY Research Bounty Program cayimby.org
YIMBY, White Privilege, and the Soul of Our Cities — Shelterforce
2.5 MILLION UNITS STATEWIDE DOES NOT REFLECT THESE REALITIES:
The statistics used to create the RHNA failed a state audit. California is not, and should not, be growing at 15%. The state knows that growth is predicted to be practically flat.
Since state redevelopment agencies closed in 2012, there has been a growing disparity in expensive to lower priced housing. Why? The free market prefers profitable development. The success of the tech market increased demand for high end housing; small houses were snatched up and flipped at high prices, often as larger remodels. Neighborhoods started changing.
Salaries for teachers and other essential workers did not increase, and they had to compete for scarcer housing — considered affordable if rent was 30% of their income.
Those at the lower end were left in desperate straits with the rising costs of living and were displaced by what used to be the middle class. Gentrification continues to displace those at the lower ends.
Even when cities try to assist low-income housing projects, money does not go far: costs are now $850,000 to $1 million per unit.
Instead of creating policy to help those in need, state policy and laws have come together under the lobbying influence of YIMBY to create a for-profit solution — a vehicle to allow dense, unfettered, high-end development.
This started in 2017, ramped up in 2019, and then the pace of legislation really took off during Covid. There over 100 laws now, and they all do the same thing: strip away the ability of localities to plan for growth and give all the power to the developers who have been salivating over suburban, semi-rural, and coastal land that has been kept at low, livable densities.
State overreach in law and policy has created dangerous precedents that undermine democracy without focus on providing affordable housing.
This has all been aided by the lobbying strength of YIMBY — Yes in My Backyard — a "nonprofit " megalith that has driven housing policy in California since its initial heavy funding by the tech industry.
There was no city-state discussion to adjust zoning and land use policy to encourage development where it could be safely and reasonably accommodated. Policy switched from a lackadaisical state response to a severe, overarching punishment-based system of compliance.
REAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS
https://marinpost.org/blog/2023/1/9/rhna-abag-demographic-projections-are-way-off
Marin cities risk ‘builder’s remedy’ over housing plan delays
marinij.com
Marin IJ Readers’ Forum for Jan. 28, 2023
marinij.com
PGE CAN’T COMMIT TO SERVICING THAT MANY NEW HOOKUPS:
Here's which Bay Area cities missed the housing element
sfexaminer.com
$5M available to build Marin County affordable housing northbaybusinessjournal.com
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.