Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
RHNA 740 units
(last cycle 78)
HE submitted
out of compliance 3/1/23
https://www.marinij.com/2023/02/09/sausalito-readies-housing-element-for-state-submission/
City appealed RHNA:
housing site list pg 166:
RHNA 639
(last cycle 78)
out of compliance 3/1/23
https://www.marinij.com/2023/01/29/tiburon-approves-housing-element-for-state-review/
City appealed RHNA:
https://abag.ca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2021-07/2023-2031_RHNA_Appeal_Town_of_Tiburon.pdf
housing site list pg 401:
RHNA 3,220 units
(last cycle 1,007)
link to piece on massive 4th street project:
https://marinpost.org/blog/2023/4/9/future-schlock
out of compliance 3/1/23
NO APPEAL
housing site list pg 119:
RHNA 979 units
(last cycle 132)
out of compliance 5/2/23
RHNA 160 units
(last cycle
out of compliance 5/2/23
RHNA 865 units
(last cycle 129)
will add about 2000 pop
HE out of compliance 5/2/23
https://www.marinij.com/2023/05/18/mill-valley-clears-housing-element-for-state-review/
RHNA 833 units
(last cycle 106)
out of compliance 3/1/23
City appealed RHNA:
Housing site list pg 123:
RHNA 725
(last cycle 72)
out of compliance 3/1/23
City appealed RHNA:
housing site list pg 77:
RHNA 2,090 units
(last cycle 415)
HE submitted
out of compliance 3/1/23
HCD rejection letter 4/12/23:
NO APPEAL
housing site list see pg 122:
RHNA 490 units
(last cycle 61)
out of compliance 3/1/23
City appealed RHNA:
https://abag.ca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2021-07/2023-2031_RHNA_Appeal_Town_of_Fairfax.pdf
RHNA 111 units
(last cycle 16)
out of compliance 3/1/23
City appealed RHNA:
housing site list pg 33:
RHNA 3,569 units
(last cycle 185)
out of compliance, in review submitted 2/1/23
County has received HCD response letter. Denial based only on AFFH
https://abag.ca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2021-07/2023-2031_RHNA_Appeal_County_of_Marin.pdf
County appealed RHNA:
https://abag.ca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2021-07/2023-2031_RHNA_Appeal_County_of_Marin.pdf
Third version sent to state:
https://www.marinij.com/2023/06/18/marin-county-adjusts-housing-element-to-secure-state-approval/
housing site list pg 4:
LARKSPUR, POPULATION 13,272
The small town of Larkspur has a RHNA just under 1000. Of those, 605 must be "affordable.* Considered massive and out of place by Larkspur standards, a twenty unit project called Magnolia Village was — under duress — approved by the Planning Commission.
Sixteen units are market rate, four are affordable.
Because 605 affordable units are required, and so few are added at a time, It would take
150 projects like that in Larkspur to fulfill the RHNA in all categories.
150 x 20 = 3,000 units
If 3,000 units are built like that, 2,400 will be market rate, and 600 will be affordable.
Market rate RHNA will be met at 700%
The affordable categories will still come up five units short
The RHNA is very specific about how the 605 will be split between categories
The city of Larkspur will be dominated by huge structures. Traffic will be unbearable.
With 3,000 new homes, the population could increase from 13,272 to 20,000.
All neighboring cities will also see that kind of density and exponential development. Marin will be a very different place.
Or the projects might stall out, or never be built. Even if cities approve all projects, they are still responsible if developers don’t complete the units.
The need for 605 units of below market rate housing isn't even supported by state figures, which show we are not going to grow by seven million people. The population will stay relatively flat.
WHY ARE SO FEW AFFORDABLE UNITS TOSSED IN ?
DEVELOPERS AREN’T INTERESTED IN PROJECTS THAT ARE NOT PROFITABLE.
* the affordable categories are moderate, low income, extra low income
THE STATE ASSIGNS NEW HOUSING NUMBERS EVERY 8 YEARS TO KEEP UP WITH FUTURE NEEDS. THIS TIME THE NUMBERS WERE ENORMOUS.
NINE MARIN CITIES AND THE COUNTY APPEALED THE HUGE NUMBERS.
All of the conditions listed to the right were legitimate bases for appeals.
ALL APPEALS WERE DENIED WITHOUT COMMENT.
TOTAL NEW HOUSING FOR CALIFORNIA: 2.5 MILLION
440,000 FOR THE BAY AREA
14,405 FOR MARIN
CHANGED CONDITIONS
DROUGHT
FIRE DANGER
NARROW ROADS
LIMITED EVACUATION ROUTES
FEMA FLOOD AREAS
SEA LEVEL RISE
TRAFFIC
SEWAGE AND SEPTIC LIMITS
INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITATIONS
LACK OF SUITABLE LAND
GEOGRAPHICAL CONSTRAINTS
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
WER'E NOT TRANSIT RICH
WER'E NOT JOB RICH
ALL REJECTED
HCD: California Department of Housing and Community Development, responsible for creating the numbers and statewide strategies for implementation ABAG is the Association of Bay Area Governments, responsible for distributing the RHNA in our area.
RHNA: Regional Housing Needs Assessment. These are the numbers distributed to the localities. The Bay Area has a RHNA or 441,000. 14,405 of those were assigned to Marin, and further broken down by locality.
HE is a Housing Element. A document containing specific reports and a plan that shows where all of the RHNA can be accomodated. Every locality must produce one, and submit it to HCD for certification. More than one draft is usually required; they are often sent back with long letters adding further reports that must be included. The HE is considered a contract between the locality and the state.
APPEALS were solicited from localities that found the RHNA unmanageable for “changed circumstances” including limited buildable land, fire and other natural hazards, environmental concerns, etc. Appeals asked for reduction in numbers.
5th and 6th CYCLE: Housing cycles are eight years long. The 5th cycle, which just ended, had reasonable RHNA. we are just starting the 6th cycle RHNA, which covers 2023 through 2031
HOUSING SITE LISTS: These are public and private lands where the city agrees they can accommodate the RHNA housing
Many cities do not have enough undeveloped, hazard free land. This area is old, and geographically constrained. The reports are expensive and time consuming to produce, and cities paid consultants tens of thousands to millions of dollars to create them, but still housing is in hazard areas without reasonable evacuation routes. Cities do not want to see local businesses razed for housing. They don’t want their parkland to be used for housing. Housing built on the most expensive land in the world will remain expensive to build and expensive to buy/rent.
https://www.marinij.com/2023/01/15/marin-cities-risk-builders-remedy-over-housing-plan-delays/
https://www.marinij.com/2022/02/03/marin-officials-wrestle-with-housing-safety-policy-conflict/
https://www.marinij.com/2023/01/28/marins-mandated-housing-much-planned-little-affordable/
Currently all Marin cities and the county are out of compliance, though some may receive certification for recently submitted HEs. Some are being sued by Californians for Home Ownership, sponsored by the California Association of Realtors.
The Housing Element reports are very long (150 to over 900 pages). At the bottom of each city listing below is the link to the HE, with page number where housing site selection starts.
The state has been assigning Regional Housing Needs Assessment numbers for population growth in eight year cycles for a long time. This is the 6th cycle, 2023-2031.
This cycle the numbers are way out of whack. They do not follow current population trends or take new realities into account.
The numbers failed a state audit, yet each city must create a report, a “Housing Element,“ that shows where the housing could be built.
That is the first step.
Being late or not having a certified Housing Element carries severe penalties. The deadline was 1/31/23. The numbers were so large that small towns with limited buildable land had to hire, at great expense, contractors to create the reports.
Most cities in the state, and in Marin, failed the deadline. The first punishment is builder’s remedy; while cities are out of compliance, any development that has a certain amount of affordability, no matter how out of scale or beyond normal limits a city would place, can be automatically approved, without the city’s consent.
Loss of transportation and housing funds are another punishment, and huge fines follow.
The Department within the Attorney General’s office that issues these punishment is called the Housing Strike Force.
Then the city is held accountable if private developers do not actually build the housing, even though the the city can only issue permits, not force anyone to build.
RHNA must be The numbers are so large that cities are set up for failure.
Failure means the state sue and fine cities into conservatorship, and public lands will be chosen and sold off for private development by an outside conservator appointed by the state.
HOUSING ELEMENTS WERE DUE 1/31/23
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.